Can I just drop this back in again? If you're going to argue in a thread don't pick and choose your posts.AHadley wrote:Red Devil wrote:silly rabbit, it is your logic that is flawed - you equate the same mod on the same (patched) engine to working with completely different engines. apples and oranges and all that.silly rabbit, it is you who isn't reading posts properlyNielk1 wrote:And be it noted that BZ2's engine is a progression of BZ1's just as 1.3 is a progression from 1.2.
Off topic: mod discussion
Moderators: GSH, VSMIT, Commando
Re: Battlezone Classic Public Beta Released
battlezone.wikia.com needs your help!
- Red Devil
- Recycler
- Posts: 4398
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 5:10 pm
- Location: High in the Rocky Mountains
Re: Battlezone Classic Public Beta Released
Question:
good work, Avatar and GBD
BTW, who said Ken was finished?
Answer:Red Devil wrote:isn't this kinda moot after Ken's work?
all the other replies to that question are either attacks or fluff and are thus rendered...moot.ssuser wrote:While some may scoff at people who spend many, many hours porting over a game, here it needs to be pointed out that while Ken did patch bz1, he did NOT put in some things that were desired, like dll capability for scripting, any IA mission launching screen, flexible naming, etc., and compared to BZ2, the graphics for BZ1 really do suck, you just can't compare the 2 engines on that level.
So this mod has genuine value for BZ modders and players.
I for one am looking forward to trying it, been toying with BZ2 again recently as prep.
I would agree on the factory weapons mod, though, that is one thing that bz2 got right. I hope that Satellite works like BZ1, though.

good work, Avatar and GBD
BTW, who said Ken was finished?
If given the truth, the people can be depended upon to meet any national crisis. The great point is to bring them the real facts - and beer.
Abraham Lincoln
Battlestrat, FE, G66, In The Shadows, Starfleet, Uler, & ZTV
Lifetime member of JBS and NRA
Abraham Lincoln
Battlestrat, FE, G66, In The Shadows, Starfleet, Uler, & ZTV
Lifetime member of JBS and NRA
Re: Battlezone Classic Public Beta Released
Not only is it an answer, but it's in bright red and size 200. I'm amazed you missed it.Nielk1 wrote:NO.Red Devil wrote:isn't this kinda moot after Ken's work?
battlezone.wikia.com needs your help!
- General BlackDragon
- Flying Mauler
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:37 am
- Contact:
Re: Battlezone Classic Public Beta Released
If I have to ask to take it to another thread one more time...
Battlezone Classic Public Forums
*****General BlackDragon*****
*****General BlackDragon*****
Re: Battlezone Classic Public Beta Released
Ultimately, nothing will happen.General BlackDragon wrote:If I have to ask to take it to another thread one more time...
Re: Battlezone Classic Public Beta Released
Create a new thread for discussing this mod. I will participate! (Not going to make it though)
Than move all the clutter there as well.
Than move all the clutter there as well.
Re: Battlezone Classic Public Beta Released
I think GBD needs mod control of his own release threads.
Activision anet servers for all legacy anet games: Anet Servers
BattleZone Club (Supporting BattleZone 1.4, The Red Odyssey, BattleZone Enhanced, BattleZone 1.5 and Bionite)
BattleZone 1 Community Since 2002
BattleZone Club (Supporting BattleZone 1.4, The Red Odyssey, BattleZone Enhanced, BattleZone 1.5 and Bionite)
BattleZone 1 Community Since 2002
Re: Battlezone Classic Public Beta Released
Or the staff could do its job, which it looks like they did btw.Apollo wrote:I think GBD needs mod control of his own release threads.
You see, there are staff for a reason. Giving the OP power over their own thread is often a horrible idea. Hell, having a moderator being an OP can lead to some pretty big BS if that moderator can't detach his responsibility from his vested interest in his topic.
I am still disgusted with the general hypocrisy, selective quoting, and general dismissive-ness above. (Edit: Not you Apollo)