My Response to Windows 10
Moderators: GSH, VSMIT, Commando
-
blue banana
- Sabre
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 2:08 pm
- Location: Banana Land, UTC−6:00 MDT
- Contact:
Re: My Response to Windows 10
Just makes you wonder what might make it so 'intense'. 
But it may also mean that it is a different kind of OS, like they went from 3-3.1 to 95-98-2000 to ME-XP-Vista and now 7-8 and the next 10-[x]. If so, just wait until M$ releases a somewhat properly working Windows 11 ....
But it may also mean that it is a different kind of OS, like they went from 3-3.1 to 95-98-2000 to ME-XP-Vista and now 7-8 and the next 10-[x]. If so, just wait until M$ releases a somewhat properly working Windows 11 ....
-
MrTwosheds
- Recycler
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:37 am
- Location: Outer Space
- Contact:
Re: My Response to Windows 10
At some point it will come full circle and users will find themselves having to type mysterious cryptic dos like commands into interactive holo tiled wiglet-net-apps so that they can be passed down through the evolved cloud layers of artistic and mercantile over programming to achieve...The Starting of a Program! Hopefully most users will have the time to re-learn how to do this before support is removed and an operating system and hardware upgrade is required to maintain profits. 
The Silence continues. The War Of Lies has no end.
Re: My Response to Windows 10
I honestly would not be surprised if one of the criteria that comes with such software would be that you need an [x]-core processor, similar as Vista sort of forced you to put extra memory in your PC. (Most of the 'commercial' PC's I worked on when Vista was 'acquired' had 1GB memory, which was absolutely not enough.)