Well, why didn't BZ2 live up to mainstream standards?

Moderators: GSH, VSMIT, Red Devil, Commando

Apollo
Sabre
Posts: 456
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 9:51 pm

Re: Well, why didn't BZ2 live up to mainstream standards?

Post by Apollo »

IDC how you want to debate from a programmers perspective, this occured only when Bz2 was played and had an AV which locked up the system and either caused a reboot or required a cold boot to get past it.

As a consumer the bugs in Bz2 caused a lot of grief for the end user.
Activision anet servers for all legacy anet games: Anet Servers
BattleZone Club (Supporting BattleZone 1.4, The Red Odyssey, BattleZone Enhanced, BattleZone 1.5 and Bionite)
BattleZone 1 Community Since 2002
User avatar
Ded10c
Recycler
Posts: 3815
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:05 am
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Contact:

Re: Well, why didn't BZ2 live up to mainstream standards?

Post by Ded10c »

Image
battlezone.wikia.com needs your help!
User avatar
Red Devil
Recycler
Posts: 4398
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 5:10 pm
Location: High in the Rocky Mountains

Re: Well, why didn't BZ2 live up to mainstream standards?

Post by Red Devil »

if they had been put on consoles, they probably would have done better:

"Mom, my game is broken!!!"

"Just hit the reset button, when it does that, dear, like this" *click*

"Thanks mom!"
If given the truth, the people can be depended upon to meet any national crisis. The great point is to bring them the real facts - and beer.
Abraham Lincoln

Battlestrat, FE, G66, In The Shadows, Starfleet, Uler, & ZTV

Lifetime member of JBS and NRA
User avatar
Zax
Attila
Posts: 1388
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:56 am

Re: Well, why didn't BZ2 live up to mainstream standards?

Post by Zax »

Apollo wrote:
GSH wrote:BZ1ers didn't like BZ2 in part because it wasn't BZ1 with larger assets and a continued focus on DM. Pissant rivalry over game modes continues to this day, with certain arrogant people preferring to be a big fish in an ever-shrinking pond rather than be nice and invite others in.
-- GSH
I would say Bzers didn't like Bz2 mainly because the vehicle physics killed the fun game play they had in Bz.
Also the AVs that occured so often that you had to fix all the lost file fragments.
Back then you couldn't get near and enemy base with a PII 350 without dropping to a slide show frame rate.
The orange skins on tanks didn't help matters.

Bz "pissant rivalry over game mods" maybe the conclusion of people throwing stones without first hand knowlage of what it's really about but what it is truely about is a small group wanting to be dictators over all of Bz, the rest is propaganda to achieve their goals.

Personally i don't care if the game code is released and there are 50 versions of the game. (grow up and get alone)
He said modes, baka yaro!

You completely brought the wrong subject up.
◥▶◀◤ row row, fight the powuh
Apollo
Sabre
Posts: 456
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 9:51 pm

Re: Well, why didn't BZ2 live up to mainstream standards?

Post by Apollo »

Zax wrote:He said modes, baka yaro!

You completely brought the wrong subject up.
The arrogance and hostility of the community would be another reason.

I don't see any rivalry between dm and strat in Bz, many people play both bb1 so excuse me if i misunderstood him.
Activision anet servers for all legacy anet games: Anet Servers
BattleZone Club (Supporting BattleZone 1.4, The Red Odyssey, BattleZone Enhanced, BattleZone 1.5 and Bionite)
BattleZone 1 Community Since 2002
User avatar
Ded10c
Recycler
Posts: 3815
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:05 am
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Contact:

Re: Well, why didn't BZ2 live up to mainstream standards?

Post by Ded10c »

He was talking about BZ2 with that sentence, not BZ1.

And hey, it's not like BZ1's community is in better shape.
battlezone.wikia.com needs your help!
User avatar
Psychedelic Rhino
Bull Dog
Posts: 984
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 5:47 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Re: Well, why didn't BZ2 live up to mainstream standards?

Post by Psychedelic Rhino »

Apollo wrote:I don't see any rivalry between dm and strat in Bz, many people play both bb1 so excuse me if i misunderstood him.
The only animosity and mean-spirited attitude I saw portrayed between DM and strat in BZ1 was spock. He continuously labeled players at his forum, "DM Dummies" and harped that ad hominem constantly before having his forum. Otherwise DM and strat players got/get along.

For me there was a clear break in my interest from strat once I moved to a high bandwidth connection. When I played with 28K and 56K I really had no idea what the 'promised land' of cable offered. Once I played DM with cable and experienced the relatively liquid smooth world of sub 150 ping, and many times sub 100, gameplay, the end-game of BZ1 strat became painful.
Firestorm29
Rattler
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 2:43 am

Re: Well, why didn't BZ2 live up to mainstream standards?

Post by Firestorm29 »

For me, it was mostly the same thing on HEAT.net. Only pain was that on the servers I played on, trying to get a strat game going took some time. That wasn't really the fault of the DMers and I got the impression that most the community on HEAT felt the same.

Though my impression about BZ1 and BZ2 in general is that is was way ahead of it's time, doing genre blending which didn't really start until a few years ago maybe?
User avatar
Ded10c
Recycler
Posts: 3815
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:05 am
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Contact:

Re: Well, why didn't BZ2 live up to mainstream standards?

Post by Ded10c »

I still have yet to see something do it to the same level as BZ did.
battlezone.wikia.com needs your help!
Firestorm29
Rattler
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 2:43 am

Re: Well, why didn't BZ2 live up to mainstream standards?

Post by Firestorm29 »

AHadley wrote:I still have yet to see something do it to the same level as BZ did.
I was thinking in the line of games like Kingdom Hearts, which combined Action and RPG action, and the later Madden games which combined sports play with a Sim environment building your own team (I think even franchise?). Yea, it's more a very generic view, but around BZ's time, from my memory games sported a single element, like only Role Play, Shooter, RTS, sports. Heck, how many multiplayer shooters even supported team deathmatches that helped a good teamwork envirnment around BZ's time? I'm pretty sure if you probably had tried to combine RTS and action in the 90s it probably wouldn't have gone nearly as well as it would today.
User avatar
Red Devil
Recycler
Posts: 4398
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 5:10 pm
Location: High in the Rocky Mountains

Re: Well, why didn't BZ2 live up to mainstream standards?

Post by Red Devil »

speaking of DM...

thinking of making a "Last Man Standing" mode where anyone killed gets put in a spectator mode so they can cheer on the final players as they duke it out until there is only one left, who is then declared the winner. "There can be only one" and all that.
If given the truth, the people can be depended upon to meet any national crisis. The great point is to bring them the real facts - and beer.
Abraham Lincoln

Battlestrat, FE, G66, In The Shadows, Starfleet, Uler, & ZTV

Lifetime member of JBS and NRA
User avatar
Nielk1
Flying Mauler
Posts: 2991
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:35 pm
Contact:

Re: Well, why didn't BZ2 live up to mainstream standards?

Post by Nielk1 »

Also, the whole STRAT/MPI thing in BZ2 is manufactured since the whole 1.2/1.3 thing is over and certain people just have to make conflict.
Feared_1
Sabre
Posts: 217
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 3:25 am
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: Well, why didn't BZ2 live up to mainstream standards?

Post by Feared_1 »

AHadley wrote:Image
This is where my signature picture would normally be. It is not, as you can see.
You're wasting your time reading this. :)
User avatar
Zero Angel
Attila
Posts: 1536
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 12:54 am
Contact:

Re: Well, why didn't BZ2 live up to mainstream standards?

Post by Zero Angel »

Nielk1 wrote:Also, the whole STRAT/MPI thing in BZ2 is manufactured since the whole 1.2/1.3 thing is over and certain people just have to make conflict.
Opposition to MPI or ST demonstrates lack of understanding. A lot of people see MPI as some repetitive mode for stupid people where you build 10 guntowers and then can't possibly lose, but MPI has its own values as a mode to take it easy in. Strat OTOH is extremely hectic with people always trying to outfox each other and it requires so much of your awareness and attention that if you 'slip' for a critical second it can lead to a downward spiral that can cost you the game (especially if you're the commander or team's 'ace' or if the teams are stacked against you). You need to be cunning in order to survive and a lot of types who would take to MPI can't stand the amount of competitiveness and pressure that's brought on by such a 'cut throat' way of playing where you constantly have to be on your toes and outwit your enemy (as well, being played for a 'fool' or 'owned' by another player can be a big ego-blow). MPI, by contrast is a simpler mode that is more about the strategic aspects (e.g. fortifying your position, mounting assaults, etc) and there is less pressure to perform so it can be serene or boring depending on what kind of player you are.
Regulators
Regulate any stealin' of this biometal pool, we're damn good, too
But you can't be any geek off the street
Gotta be handy with the chains if you know what I mean
Earn your keep
Apollo
Sabre
Posts: 456
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 9:51 pm

Re: Well, why didn't BZ2 live up to mainstream standards?

Post by Apollo »

I take it the 1.2/1.3 thing ended when 1.2 stoped working on gamespy?
Activision anet servers for all legacy anet games: Anet Servers
BattleZone Club (Supporting BattleZone 1.4, The Red Odyssey, BattleZone Enhanced, BattleZone 1.5 and Bionite)
BattleZone 1 Community Since 2002
Post Reply