server down
Moderators: GSH, VSMIT, Red Devil, Commando
- General BlackDragon
- Flying Mauler
- Posts: 2408
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:37 am
- Contact:
Re: server down
Won't help when the people that don't use it, don't come to forum
Battlezone Classic Public Forums
*****General BlackDragon*****
*****General BlackDragon*****
- jack775544
- Thunderbolt
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:41 am
- Location: Australia
Re: server down
So does that patch actually work. Last I heard was that it was still a bit dodgy. And since I only usually play with friends, there has been no real need to upgrade as it is easy to set up a VPN. If it works then i will certainly upgrade to that patch.MrTwosheds wrote:There are a number of solutions available. The problem is getting everyone to use the same one.
I had hoped the community would take up using the b91s openspy patch, but they don't seem to be doing that.
"The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he doesn't exist" - Charles Baudelaire
- MrTwosheds
- Recycler
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:37 am
- Location: Outer Space
- Contact:
Re: server down
It works if bz2 is set up right and you don't press the wrong button...
But as far as I am aware very few other players have bothered to use it and it is incompatible with other bz2 versions, so it will only work with others patched to b91s. It was only released in order to assist with open spy testing and development, which does not seem to be happening any more. It is buggy. If you are only playing with friends you might as well stick with whatever works for you for now.
But as far as I am aware very few other players have bothered to use it and it is incompatible with other bz2 versions, so it will only work with others patched to b91s. It was only released in order to assist with open spy testing and development, which does not seem to be happening any more. It is buggy. If you are only playing with friends you might as well stick with whatever works for you for now.
The Silence continues. The War Of Lies has no end.
- DarkCobra262
- Sabre
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:13 pm
- Contact:
Re: server down
This is what I would do, GameRanger worked for getting my little brother and I connected (although we also used it for Diablo II)MrTwosheds wrote:It works if bz2 is set up right and you don't press the wrong button...
But as far as I am aware very few other players have bothered to use it and it is incompatible with other bz2 versions, so it will only work with others patched to b91s. It was only released in order to assist with open spy testing and development, which does not seem to be happening any more. It is buggy. If you are only playing with friends you might as well stick with whatever works for you for now.
Modding/Modelling like a noob...
-
- Scrap
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:28 pm
Re: server down
So where's this situation at right now?
Re: server down
PB6.3's matchmaking works. Most people are still playing 6.2 because BZ2's community is full of conservatives rather than progressivists.
battlezone.wikia.com needs your help!
-
- Scrap
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 3:28 pm
Re: server down
I've just returned to the BZ2 community after a long time away, and I'm using the 1.3.6.2 patch.
After clicking "multi", I instantly get the "Could not get server list" error box. All firewalls and antivirus switched off.
After clicking "multi", I instantly get the "Could not get server list" error box. All firewalls and antivirus switched off.
-
- Sabre
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:17 pm
- Location: Texas
Re: server down
Use PB6.3 instead. Glu Mobile shut down the QR2 protocol from GameSpy after they bought them out. Caused quite an uproar, but of course, Glu Mobile doesn't give two ****s. Here's the topic: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1541
The latest patch uses RakNet which does work, with maybe the occasional lag out perhaps, but otherwise its pretty stable. At least in my playing. I've only had one time when my friend was getting a lot of resyncs, so I had him rejoin and it worked from then on.
The latest patch uses RakNet which does work, with maybe the occasional lag out perhaps, but otherwise its pretty stable. At least in my playing. I've only had one time when my friend was getting a lot of resyncs, so I had him rejoin and it worked from then on.
If you happen to be looking through my posts, I have completely dumped all things related to Battlezone. Do not contact me, do not bother me. Been harassed enough as it is and am done entirely.
- Zero Angel
- Attila
- Posts: 1536
- Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 12:54 am
- Contact:
Re: server down
While I won't say that you're wrong when I say that a good portion of the community is full of conservatives; thats not why everyone hasnt moved to 6.3. The reason why some are still doing 6.2/ipjoin are these:AHadley wrote:PB6.3's matchmaking works. Most people are still playing 6.2 because BZ2's community is full of conservatives rather than progressivists.
1) Some of the prominent people who are known for hosting in 6.2 can't get hosting to work in 6.3 (though maybe they have to do their port forwards to host properly)
2) Larger games (>4 players) tend to lag more in 6.3 (speculative, I havent played large games in 6.3 but this is what I've read)
3) Large amounts of lag or synchronization problems tend to AV clients (LZMAcompress server state is corrupt).
4) 'Bad' clients (e.g. some who patched up from 6.2 instead of using a 'clean' install) can lag the game severely.
Regulators
Regulate any stealin' of this biometal pool, we're damn good, too
But you can't be any geek off the street
Gotta be handy with the chains if you know what I mean
Earn your keep
Regulate any stealin' of this biometal pool, we're damn good, too
But you can't be any geek off the street
Gotta be handy with the chains if you know what I mean
Earn your keep
Re: server down
Zero Angel wrote:While I won't say that you're wrong when I say that a good portion of the community is full of conservatives; thats not why everyone hasnt moved to 6.3. The reason why some are still doing 6.2/ipjoin are these:AHadley wrote:PB6.3's matchmaking works. Most people are still playing 6.2 because BZ2's community is full of conservatives rather than progressivists.
1) Some of the prominent people who are known for hosting in 6.2 can't get hosting to work in 6.3 (though maybe they have to do their port forwards to host properly)
2) Larger games (>4 players) tend to lag more in 6.3 (speculative, I havent played large games in 6.3 but this is what I've read)
3) Large amounts of lag or synchronization problems tend to AV clients (LZMAcompress server state is corrupt).
4) 'Bad' clients (e.g. some who patched up from 6.2 instead of using a 'clean' install) can lag the game severely.
I'm (over)simplifying that to "people prefer the bugs they know to the bugs they don't".
battlezone.wikia.com needs your help!
- MrTwosheds
- Recycler
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:37 am
- Location: Outer Space
- Contact:
Re: server down
And obviously this group of people do realise that they are the only remaining large group of players capable of supplying the test information required to get the problems fixed, that their choice may well mean that it never will work properly and that natural player attrition plus no matchmaking will eventually end their bz2 playing days.
I don't know why I even bothered to make this comment as it should be obvious. I realised at the time that the gamespy disconnect was probably going to be a terminal blow and that elements in the strat community would once again lead the few remaining active players away from any new release simply because that is what they have always done.
R.I.P Battlezone2. (no that can't be right!)
I don't know why I even bothered to make this comment as it should be obvious. I realised at the time that the gamespy disconnect was probably going to be a terminal blow and that elements in the strat community would once again lead the few remaining active players away from any new release simply because that is what they have always done.
R.I.P Battlezone2. (no that can't be right!)
The Silence continues. The War Of Lies has no end.
Re: server down
Has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with it. Conservative does not mean one refuses change, that is the gross oversimplification made by "progressives" to try to make themselves look better. Conservatives are about caution in advance and preservation of original ideals. The more you know.AHadley wrote:...because BZ2's community is full of conservatives rather than progressivists.
Re: server down
Conservative (n): One who favours the status quo or advocates return to an earlier status.Nielk1 wrote:Has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with it. Conservative does not mean one refuses change, that is the gross oversimplification made by "progressives" to try to make themselves look better. Conservatives are about caution in advance and preservation of original ideals. The more you know.AHadley wrote:...because BZ2's community is full of conservatives rather than progressivists.
battlezone.wikia.com needs your help!
Re: server down
con·serv·a·tiveAHadley wrote:Conservative (n): One who favours the status quo or advocates return to an earlier status.Nielk1 wrote:Has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with it. Conservative does not mean one refuses change, that is the gross oversimplification made by "progressives" to try to make themselves look better. Conservatives are about caution in advance and preservation of original ideals. The more you know.AHadley wrote:...because BZ2's community is full of conservatives rather than progressivists.
/kənˈsərvətiv/
Adjective
Holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in politics or religion.
Charging headfirst into anything is stupid. This is why we beta test things before release actually.
Re: server down
AHadley, i just read what you wrote now lol 2014. Clearly you have no concept of Battlezone 1. Battlezone 1 was written for 56.6 and even slower phone modems. It is the perfect game. For that time period. It still kicks battlezone 2's ass in death matches. But for strategy battlezone 2 is better. I am more a strategy player. Regardless, the servers issue has never been an issue there. I was the best player in Battlezone 1 on the 1.0 server for two years. I could not stand the 1.4 patch. I've played alot of Red Oddyssey with invites from the ARF (Attacking Rebel Forces - Clan) in the past. And I had a lot of fun with them. But they like Walker-Bombers matches too much. The last time i checked battlezone 1 had more people on the server logged in and playing than battlezone 2. There is a split in the community due to some new patches...it wiill iron itself out it always had.