Page 97 of 99

Re: Interesting article thread

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 1:57 am
by MrTwosheds
WHY ARE THERE POLITICAL COMMENTS ON THAT ARTICLE?!
Because clearly the whole purpose of electing a President is just to have someone to blame for everything. Light refracts off of the robbers skin in a way that is more like Obama's than Romney's , so its got to be Obama's fault right? And that's modern politics...makes just about as much sense as modern economics. :lol:

Re: Interesting article thread

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 2:39 am
by Zenophas

Re: Interesting article thread

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 4:34 am
by Nielk1
Well of course? If you didn't like a country and a president running for reelection had a history of and policies leading to a waning of that country, why would you not support him? Hell, he campaigned through the world during his entire presidency, apologizing for America.
Notice the full description of how the accident happened, the details of what the mother thinks happened (she is emotional and has is not expected to know what the police are saying at the time of that statement), and the tirade of comments demanding that the officer be put in jail regardless of the facts, saying that things happened even more troublesome then what the mother believes.

The grenade wasn't thrown, it was dropped because the dummy thought it was a dud. The department should pay the medical fees and a little bit on top of that, issue and apology, and it should be done.

Re: Interesting article thread

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:27 am
by MrTwosheds
Well of course? If you didn't like a country and a president running for reelection had a history of and policies leading to a waning of that country, why would you not support him? Hell, he campaigned through the world during his entire presidency, apologizing for America.
So why does the only country on the list that does actually have a really good rational reason to dislike your country (your bombing them) support Romney? :) Maybe they think he won't bomb them... :)

Re: Interesting article thread

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 6:04 pm
by Red Devil

Re: Interesting article thread

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 6:09 pm
by Red Devil

Re: Interesting article thread

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 7:56 pm
by Iron_Maiden
I thought it was the United Nations?:

http://freebeacon.com/u-n-human-rights- ... companies/

Re: Interesting article thread

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:14 pm
by GSH
Live on the east coast? Prepare for a freezing hurricane.

Having 3-4 days worth of food/water on hand is really good to do. Katrina demonstrated that governmental help is like a freight train -- delivers a lot, but takes a while to get there.

-- GSH

Re: Interesting article thread

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 9:27 pm
by Ded10c
Iron_Maiden wrote:I thought it was the United Nations?:

http://freebeacon.com/u-n-human-rights- ... companies/
Haha, first I've heard of the UNHRC being biased. Especially against Israel, of all places. From their track record, if they call someone out on human rights offences then they needed calling out on them.

Re: Interesting article thread

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 10:03 pm
by Red Devil
GSH wrote:Live on the east coast? Prepare for a freezing hurricane.

Having 3-4 days worth of food/water on hand is really good to do. Katrina demonstrated that governmental help is like a freight train -- delivers a lot, but takes a while to get there.

-- GSH

shhh, we need to thin the herd.

Re: Interesting article thread

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 3:54 pm
by Red Devil
i wonder if the liberals, i.e., the victim party, will sue if people die from this, like they did in italy:

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-575 ... nkenstorm/

Re: Interesting article thread

Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 12:21 am
by Iron_Maiden

Re: Interesting article thread

Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 1:29 am
by Red Devil

Re: Interesting article thread

Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 10:04 am
by Red Spot
Iron_Maiden wrote:"I'm not pregnant.":

http://www.france24.com/en/20121026-ger ... mour-woman
Reminds me a bit when a gland 'in my face' got infected and it in a matter of weeks became a 'big blue colored lump' right underneath my right eye.
And since the churgeon didnt know what it was he first wanted to do some tests so the infection got an other 5 or so weeks to grow.
The churgeon even told me that he never even knew of these type of infections getting so big, which is also why he did all the tests before he started cutting. He also had to remove it in 2 halfs or else he had to cut open ½ my face.
Part that I find rather interesting myself is that he completelly removed the gland with the comment that you dont need it ... so why is it there in the first place, and why wont you also remove the one on the left side .... :mrgreen:

Re: Interesting article thread

Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 3:32 pm
by Red Devil
he's hoping that one will also get really infected so he can charge more for that one, too.