Off topic: mod discussion
Posted: Tue Jan 01, 2013 8:15 pm
isn't this kinda moot after Ken's work?
http://bzforum.matesfamily.org/ -- Battlezone, Battlezone 2 forums
http://bzforum.matesfamily.org/
To properly lambaste this comment in the way due would require more words than the posting limit. Thus, simply, NO.Red Devil wrote:isn't this kinda moot after Ken's work?
You have grossly misunderstood the logic. The point made was of the progression. And be it noted that BZ2's engine is a progression of BZ1's just as 1.3 is a progression from 1.2. I am further disgusted at the flawed logic to make such a hypocritical view work.Red Devil wrote:using that logic, if someone remade FE and G66 using the battlezone engine, then it would somehow be...better?
oh, i get it; using a completely different engine to do something that already runs better in the original patched engine is better. kinda like using the unreal engine to remake bz2. okay...
why have pancakes for breakfast? why have your radio turned to THAT station? why paint your wall THAT color? why play any game at all??? Maybe because you want to, it's fun, refreshing to play it in the bz2 engine, your mom sucks on... er, forget that one...Baconboy wrote:So is this just a remake of BZ1 as a BZ2 mod? Why not just play the normal BZ1?
AHadley wrote:...
And let's remember the further expansions planned, both by GBD/Avatar and others. The Ancients campaign, the RotBD campaign (at last!), the PASC expansion, and various other bits and pieces.
silly rabbit, it is your logic that is flawed - you equate the same mod on the same (patched) engine to working with completely different engines. apples and oranges and all that.Nielk1 wrote:To properly lambaste this comment in the way due would require more words than the posting limit. Thus, simply, NO.Red Devil wrote:isn't this kinda moot after Ken's work?
Or maybe any work on FE after the 1.2 version is moot since the 1.2 version exists and people can just install that. Eh?
Red Devil wrote:silly rabbit, it is your logic that is flawed - you equate the same mod on the same (patched) engine to working with completely different engines. apples and oranges and all that.
silly rabbit, it is you who isn't reading posts properlyNielk1 wrote:And be it noted that BZ2's engine is a progression of BZ1's just as 1.3 is a progression from 1.2.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1esrEb9p0WcAHadley wrote:Red Devil wrote:silly rabbit, it is your logic that is flawed - you equate the same mod on the same (patched) engine to working with completely different engines. apples and oranges and all that.silly rabbit, it is you who isn't reading posts properlyNielk1 wrote:And be it noted that BZ2's engine is a progression of BZ1's just as 1.3 is a progression from 1.2.
thank you; this is the sensible reply i was seeking - not some illogical comparisons...ssuser wrote:While some may scoff at people who spend many, many hours porting over a game, here it needs to be pointed out that while Ken did patch bz1, he did NOT put in some things that were desired, like dll capability for scripting, any IA mission launching screen, flexible naming, etc., and compared to BZ2, the graphics for BZ1 really do suck, you just can't compare the 2 engines on that level.
So this mod has genuine value for BZ modders and players.
I for one am looking forward to trying it, been toying with BZ2 again recently as prep.
I would agree on the factory weapons mod, though, that is one thing that bz2 got right. I hope that Satellite works like BZ1, though.
Look, I am tired of your dismissive attitude. You try your hardest to demean the work of others as improper, irreverent, unneeded, or otherwise unwanted, then when called out on it you attack the person who called you out. Failing that, you take some random unrelated and kind comment by someone else, quote it, call it nice and try to use it in demeaning the person who called you out on it as uncivil and illogical. Do you seriously think that people fall for that?Red Devil wrote:thank you; this is the sensible reply i was seeking - not some illogical comparisons...ssuser wrote:...
Trying to sweep bad behavior under the rug is not a solution. You and Avatar worked very hard on this and neither of you deserve to be told there was no point. How about you grow a pair and defend your work?General BlackDragon wrote:@N1, & RD, take it to another thread please, should you choose to continue arguing reading each other's posts correctly.