Assault tanks manage to destroy a group of 3 enemy tanks and 2 scouts.
One of the assault tanks is loses half of its hull strength.
Search found 505 matches
- Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:41 am
- Forum: Off Topic Board
- Topic: Let's play a game:
- Replies: 60
- Views: 25872
- Sat Feb 07, 2015 5:34 am
- Forum: Off Topic Board
- Topic: Off-topic (was Battlezone 3 RANT)
- Replies: 103
- Views: 37971
Re: Off-topic (was Battlezone 3 RANT)
I;m the programmer BBB, why are you the one showing binary thinking? Why are you not? My 'binary thinking' is limited to whether something is existent/non-existent or true/false. As it is impossible for a third option to exist in either of those binary opposites, binary thinking is justified, the d...
- Sat Feb 07, 2015 2:38 am
- Forum: Off Topic Board
- Topic: Off-topic (was Battlezone 3 RANT)
- Replies: 103
- Views: 37971
Re: Off-topic (was Battlezone 3 RANT)
I don't think that there is a difference there at all. You can't not believe in something which you consider true, therefore you must by default consider it untrue, hence disbelieve it. That's the logical fallacy of False Implication, to the letter. The fallacy of false implication occurs when a st...
- Fri Feb 06, 2015 4:50 am
- Forum: Off Topic Board
- Topic: Let's play a game:
- Replies: 60
- Views: 25872
Re: Let's play a game:
Begins building a squad of Mortar Bikes
Two enemy tanks manage to destroy the partially repaired Gun Tower
Two enemy tanks manage to destroy the partially repaired Gun Tower
- Fri Feb 06, 2015 4:17 am
- Forum: Off Topic Board
- Topic: Off-topic (was Battlezone 3 RANT)
- Replies: 103
- Views: 37971
Re: Off-topic (was Battlezone 3 RANT)
For now, I suggest that we agree to disagree.
- Fri Feb 06, 2015 12:48 am
- Forum: Off Topic Board
- Topic: Off-topic (was Battlezone 3 RANT)
- Replies: 103
- Views: 37971
Re: Off-topic (was Battlezone 3 RANT)
Skepticism is not believing something; disbelief is believing it to be untrue. The difference appears subtle, but is vast. I don't think that there is a difference there at all. You can't not believe in something which you consider true, therefore you must by default consider it untrue, hence disbe...
- Thu Feb 05, 2015 11:53 pm
- Forum: Off Topic Board
- Topic: Let's play a game:
- Replies: 60
- Views: 25872
Re: Let's play a game:
Enemy Assault Tank shows up and heavily damages one of the new Gun Towers.
- Thu Feb 05, 2015 10:59 pm
- Forum: Battlezone 2 Mod Making
- Topic: Sir, we have bad news....
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2673
Re: Sir, we have bad news....
Avoid the ones making a ticking noise?
- Thu Feb 05, 2015 10:39 pm
- Forum: Off Topic Board
- Topic: Off-topic (was Battlezone 3 RANT)
- Replies: 103
- Views: 37971
Re: Off-topic (was Battlezone 3 RANT)
Well, I was taking the term "assume" to mean "assume". I had no way of knowing I should have been taking it as "accept", but I'm glad I know now before we started arguing completely separate issues. Accepting that two mutually exclusive situations are possible is perfe...
- Thu Feb 05, 2015 9:54 pm
- Forum: Off Topic Board
- Topic: Let's play a game:
- Replies: 60
- Views: 25872
Re: Let's play a game:
Instantly regrets destroying Assault Tanks because a huge enemy attack force is heading right for where they were
- Thu Feb 05, 2015 9:25 pm
- Forum: Off Topic Board
- Topic: Off-topic (was Battlezone 3 RANT)
- Replies: 103
- Views: 37971
Re: Off-topic (was Battlezone 3 RANT)
Similarly there is a physical barrier to us knowing whether (a) god(s) exist(s) - but we know (he/she/it/they) either do(es) or do(es) not. Instead of a single answer, there is a dual answer. As I phrased it earlier, until you open the box your God both does and does not exist. It is paradoxical, b...
- Thu Feb 05, 2015 12:57 pm
- Forum: Off Topic Board
- Topic: Let's play a game:
- Replies: 60
- Views: 25872
Re: Let's play a game:
Drives out in search of more scrap pools
- Thu Feb 05, 2015 12:46 pm
- Forum: Off Topic Board
- Topic: Off-topic (was Battlezone 3 RANT)
- Replies: 103
- Views: 37971
Re: Off-topic (was Battlezone 3 RANT)
If evidence is required to prove that something does not exist, it gives credence to anybody who wants to claim that something exists without being able to prove it. It doesn't prove their argument, Nor does it prove yours. They already have credence. True. It doesn't prove mine. Evidence is requir...
- Thu Feb 05, 2015 11:11 am
- Forum: Off Topic Board
- Topic: Off-topic (was Battlezone 3 RANT)
- Replies: 103
- Views: 37971
Re: Off-topic (was Battlezone 3 RANT)
I follow both that and the opposite. If we were to discover evidence for a higher power tomorrow it would obviously not leap suddenly into existence; it will have been there all along. An assumption that something does not exist because there is no evidence is just as logically falsifible as the in...
- Thu Feb 05, 2015 6:21 am
- Forum: Off Topic Board
- Topic: Off-topic (was Battlezone 3 RANT)
- Replies: 103
- Views: 37971
Re: Off-topic (was Battlezone 3 RANT)
While presumed innocent, the verdict could go either way. Once presumed guilty, the verdict has gone one way.AHadley wrote:What says "innocent" should be equivalent to "non-existent" and not the other way around?