HQ Textures

Moderators: GSH, VSMIT, Red Devil, Commando

User avatar
Cyber
Sabre
Posts: 202
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:46 pm

HQ Textures

Post by Cyber »

Heya,

I just found out that bz2-units support bigger textures than 256x256(which look like garbage), so I took the sabre-texture and made it 1024x1024 and added a 200x200 koala on there.

Image

The koala looks kinda sweet, eh?

Yeah and now to my suggestion: Lets make HQ Textures for buildings and units? The koala looks very sharp(?if thats the right word?), means the textures can be HQ.

I will start with the work right now, I'll try my best.

Questions:
-Who could help?
-GSH, would you include these textures in the next patch as soon they are HQ?
-Is it possible to do the same thing with the map-textures?

Viva la Revolution.
Teamspeak 3: teamspeak.com
TS3 Server(Ugonland): 74.91.115.34
User avatar
bigbadbogie
Bull Dog
Posts: 586
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:12 am
Location: Ecuadorian Embassy

Re: HQ Textures

Post by bigbadbogie »

The highest resolution that is possible in BZ2 is 2048x4096, as it is the highest resolution which doesn't make the DXTGen crash.

Also, nice Koala. Strange bloody critters.
"You think that you can wipe out an entire civilisation without consequences?" - Rachel

http://www.moddb.com/mods/qf2-essence-to-a-thief
https://www.indiedb.com/games/husky-ashcon-i/
User avatar
Cyber
Sabre
Posts: 202
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:46 pm

Re: HQ Textures

Post by Cyber »

bigbadbogie wrote:The highest resolution that is possible in BZ2 is 2048x4096, as it is the highest resolution which doesn't make the DXTGen crash.
Okay, but what about maps?
bigbadbogie wrote: Also, nice Koala. Strange bloody critters.
Stay intopic, please :P
Teamspeak 3: teamspeak.com
TS3 Server(Ugonland): 74.91.115.34
User avatar
Ded10c
Recycler
Posts: 3815
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:05 am
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Contact:

Re: HQ Textures

Post by Ded10c »

Cyber wrote:
bigbadbogie wrote:The highest resolution that is possible in BZ2 is 2048x4096, as it is the highest resolution which doesn't make the DXTGen crash.
Okay, but what about maps?
bigbadbogie wrote: Also, nice Koala. Strange bloody critters.
Stay intopic, please :P
That goes for maps as well.

And you put the koala there :P
battlezone.wikia.com needs your help!
User avatar
Cyber
Sabre
Posts: 202
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:46 pm

Re: HQ Textures

Post by Cyber »

Here my first success:
(+using ZA's UEP skins of course!)
Example sabre.

Before (256x256)
Image

After (1024x1024+ZA's UEP skin + some rendering effects, enlarging etc.)
Image
(if you see the red X just ignore it, was just a note to myself and won't appear in the real skin)
Teamspeak 3: teamspeak.com
TS3 Server(Ugonland): 74.91.115.34
User avatar
Nielk1
Flying Mauler
Posts: 2991
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:35 pm
Contact:

Re: HQ Textures

Post by Nielk1 »

Up-scaling algorithm? When you get a good process let us know and I can try to create an automation. Are you using ZA's originals or the UEP's tweaked ones, because I notice some odd things at the lights and I am wondering if that is an up-scaling artifact or something we fixed already.

I was thinking about doing them fresh with shape layers but the metal bits always get me. I can do the orange parts perfectly.
User avatar
MrTwosheds
Recycler
Posts: 3059
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:37 am
Location: Outer Space
Contact:

Re: HQ Textures

Post by MrTwosheds »

Who could help?
I have done one or two textures up to 1024x1024, I already did ivtank! Not just upscaling though but "detail reconstruction" too.
I would be happy to share stuff with you.
-GSH, would you include these textures in the next patch as soon they are HQ?
The current plan, is to not include (can't include stuff that don't exist) so really we should be aiming for a HQ addon pack, which gives people a choice.

-Is it possible to do the same thing with the map-textures?
Yes, obviously it is best to do so in a restrained manner, because everyone likes their maps to go fast. 512x512 terrain textures are excellent in my opinion.

Gimps upscaling plugin is rather good, but obviously it can't add detail that just isn't there.

The one problem I have, is the lettering on some of the units, I have no idea what font its in, or wether its a font at all. Damn difficult to make it look right when you can barely see it in the first place.
The Silence continues. The War Of Lies has no end.
Mortarion
Griefer
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:29 am

Re: HQ Textures

Post by Mortarion »

bigbadbogie wrote:The highest resolution that is possible in BZ2 is 2048x4096, as it is the highest resolution which doesn't make the DXTGen crash.

Also, nice Koala. Strange bloody critters.
I once used 4096x4096 while developing maps for vsr, strange thing is it seems the texture is not drawn until it is within 100m or so. It is black and choppy until in range.

the dxtbz2gen may freeze but it will still create the dxtbz2 file, very, very slowly though.

high res textures usually kill framerate cyber, i use all the lowest settings possible (except object detail which is medium) and still max at 60-80 fps in a strat. dm, not so bad.
MLG bz2 m8
User avatar
Cyber
Sabre
Posts: 202
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 5:46 pm

Re: HQ Textures

Post by Cyber »

Nielk1 wrote:Up-scaling algorithm? When you get a good process let us know and I can try to create an automation. Are you using ZA's originals or the UEP's tweaked ones, because I notice some odd things at the lights and I am wondering if that is an up-scaling artifact or something we fixed already.

I was thinking about doing them fresh with shape layers but the metal bits always get me. I can do the orange parts perfectly.

Up-scaling algorithm? - I am using a special program called "Ben Vista Photo Zoom" - it enlarges pictures with almost no quality-loose, trough a mix of blending/completing.

Are you using ZA's originals- Mmh dunno, maybe you post a link with the originals just to be sure (folder is called UEP skins afaik).

I can do the orange parts perfectly.- Great, I will make a plan, you are already registered on the "orange parts" ;)



MrTwosheds wrote:Who could help?
I have done one or two textures up to 1024x1024, I already did ivtank! Not just upscaling though but "detail reconstruction" too.
I would be happy to share stuff with you.
Thats great, as I wrote above I am using a program called "Ben Vista Photo Zoom"- I can't remember if it was free or my dad bought it, but the detail reconstruction is sorta "unnice", maybe we could combine your detail reconstruction & the work of the program to get a proper result.
MrTwosheds wrote:
-GSH, would you include these textures in the next patch as soon they are HQ?
The current plan, is to not include (can't include stuff that don't exist) so really we should be aiming for a HQ addon pack, which gives people a choice.
Yeah, that was my 2nd idea. To be honest I would prefer to have it in stock, so even the users who are not reading forums/ unexperienced users have the feeling of a HQ bz2. @ ZA: We may also include it in VSR?

MrTwosheds wrote: Gimps upscaling plugin is rather good, but obviously it can't add detail that just isn't there.
I guess every upscaling-program is doing this, but I will compare it with Ben Vista Photo Zoom, to see which program is bringing out the better result.
MrTwosheds wrote: The one problem I have, is the lettering on some of the units, I have no idea what font its in, or wether its a font at all. Damn difficult to make it look right when you can barely see it in the first place.
I guess thats one of the smallest problems, we'll find a way to deal with it.
Mortarion wrote:
high res textures usually kill framerate cyber, i use all the lowest settings possible (except object detail which is medium) and still max at 60-80 fps in a strat. dm, not so bad.
I see what you mean, tho its time to upgrade your PC then ;) I dont really think these texture-changes will drop your FPS very much, anyways I would prefer to have a toggle for the texture like "Low, Medium, HQ". (In case of doing adding it to stock.)

So what I gotta do now:
-Find out which program is better for upscaling: Gimp or Ben Vista Photo Zoom ?
-Then, upscale the ISDF units/buildings - textures and the Scion units/buildings - textures to 1024x1024 + some renderring effects (Paint.net)
-Make a short list with:
-Nielk 1 "orange parts"
-MrTwoSheds "detail reconstruction"
Teamspeak 3: teamspeak.com
TS3 Server(Ugonland): 74.91.115.34
User avatar
Zero Angel
Attila
Posts: 1536
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 12:54 am
Contact:

Re: HQ Textures

Post by Zero Angel »

Nielk1 wrote:Up-scaling algorithm? When you get a good process let us know and I can try to create an automation. Are you using ZA's originals or the UEP's tweaked ones, because I notice some odd things at the lights and I am wondering if that is an up-scaling artifact or something we fixed already.

I was thinking about doing them fresh with shape layers but the metal bits always get me. I can do the orange parts perfectly.
Not sure what was broken in my originals or how they were fixed. Except maybe some of the parts that used transparency came out pure white in certain situations (never did figure that one out).

Regarding up-scaling algorithms, not sure what would be the best. Bicubic is obviously the easiest one to grab for, but it doesnt usually yield a large improvement for upscaling (that said, testing in-game is probably the best way to compare). Most people who have played ZSNES or any other modern 8-16 bit console emulator has probably heard of the Hqx scaling algorithm. It's quite excellent as it's probably the only algorithm i've seen that keeps the lines clean when upscaling and has high accuracy.

UPDATE: It looks like theres a Paint.NET filter for that.
Last edited by Zero Angel on Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Regulators
Regulate any stealin' of this biometal pool, we're damn good, too
But you can't be any geek off the street
Gotta be handy with the chains if you know what I mean
Earn your keep
User avatar
MrTwosheds
Recycler
Posts: 3059
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:37 am
Location: Outer Space
Contact:

Re: HQ Textures

Post by MrTwosheds »

I once used 4096x4096 while developing maps for vsr
That is a bit big really, I figure most people use 1280 x 1024 screen resolution, so the only people who are actually going to see a full 4098x4098 texture are those with really huge monitors.
Just got to be a bit sensible what sizes you use for what. 512 is ok for terrain detail, use 256 or 128 for layer 0, so hardcore retrogamers can still play on their steam powered pc's.
Units look great with 1024x1024, the high detail does not appear until you get close to it. That's what the dxtbz2 does, very good at being optimal.
I have used 2048x2048 textures for sky domes, because they look better that way, that's the only place I use them at that size.
The Silence continues. The War Of Lies has no end.
User avatar
Zero Angel
Attila
Posts: 1536
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 12:54 am
Contact:

Re: HQ Textures

Post by Zero Angel »

Mortarion uses HD textures in his maps. The main grass texture and the stone textures on Ancient Outposts are particularly noticable. That said, I think that there's too little payoff for the potential framerate problems it causes if you go too high. For example his other map, Excavation, uses HD textures but they're not very noticable because they're relatively low contrast.
Regulators
Regulate any stealin' of this biometal pool, we're damn good, too
But you can't be any geek off the street
Gotta be handy with the chains if you know what I mean
Earn your keep
User avatar
Red Spot
Attila
Posts: 1629
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:14 pm
Location: The Netherlands

Re: HQ Textures

Post by Red Spot »

MrTwosheds wrote:The current plan, is to not include (can't include stuff that don't exist) so really we should be aiming for a HQ addon pack, which gives people a choice.
If those who are involved are going to do that and dont mind a bit of extra work, I'd suggest making different size versions so you could pick wich to use on you electrically or steam driven PC ;)
User avatar
Zax
Attila
Posts: 1388
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:56 am

Re: HQ Textures

Post by Zax »

BZ2 doesn't have texture LODing iirc so don't go huge. Unless it is automatic.

Resizing an undetailed low res image just makes it into a more undetailed hi res image. Hope this doesn't fall into that trap.
◥▶◀◤ row row, fight the powuh
User avatar
MrTwosheds
Recycler
Posts: 3059
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:37 am
Location: Outer Space
Contact:

Re: HQ Textures

Post by MrTwosheds »

Like I said if your screen only draws 1024 pixels from top to bottom, there is little point using anything bigger than that. 2048 works for sky domes because you only ever see half of 1 texture at once.
Terrain is more problematic because of the variability of view distance and the number of tiles it needs to draw. 512x 512 seems to work acceptably to me.

dxtbz2 is texture LODing Zax.
But you are right there is no point just resizing an image without adding detail.
The Silence continues. The War Of Lies has no end.
Post Reply