the Battlezone Franchise was sold to Rebellion Interactive

Moderators: GSH, VSMIT, Red Devil, Commando

User avatar
Ded10c
Recycler
Posts: 3815
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:05 am
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Contact:

Re: the Battlezone Franchise was sold to Rebellion Interacti

Post by Ded10c »

Well, sort of. If you want to use the name or arena-tank-shooter property, you need Rebellion. If you want living metals and space opera, you need Activision.
battlezone.wikia.com needs your help!
User avatar
Nielk1
Flying Mauler
Posts: 2991
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:35 pm
Contact:

Re: the Battlezone Franchise was sold to Rebellion Interacti

Post by Nielk1 »

You know if anyone made a BZ3 they would probably just **** all over it.
User avatar
MrTwosheds
Recycler
Posts: 3059
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:37 am
Location: Outer Space
Contact:

Re: the Battlezone Franchise was sold to Rebellion Interacti

Post by MrTwosheds »

Given the advances in game tech, any bz3 would inevitably be a very different game now anyway.
The Silence continues. The War Of Lies has no end.
Roscoe
Rattler
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 5:00 pm

Re: the Battlezone Franchise was sold to Rebellion Interacti

Post by Roscoe »

I don't see why. It would be prettier, but there's no reason to toss out all those satisfying game mechanics. The hover vehicles may have been a design decision to save on resources, but they turned out to be incredibly fun to drive.
User avatar
GSH
Patch Creator
Posts: 2485
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 4:55 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: the Battlezone Franchise was sold to Rebellion Interacti

Post by GSH »

As I said here, the BZ1/2 community has been so amazingly intolerant of any changes. It would be better for a new hovertank FPS+RTS game to be made withOUT the 'Battlezone' name attached, so that people would leave their baggage out of future titles. Passion is good, but when it becomes so exclusionary as to attack anything that's not exactly what you want, it becomes toxic.

-- GSH
Roscoe
Rattler
Posts: 93
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 5:00 pm

Re: the Battlezone Franchise was sold to Rebellion Interacti

Post by Roscoe »

I never raised hell about it, but I also thought the changes to the physics (removal of hovering and addition of thrust vector normalization) took away a lot of the fun in flying those ships. Those bugs accidentally uncovered some incredibly fun gameplay. It was wonky, but extremely satisfying.

You had angry people on one side wanting that pilot experience, and angry people on the other side wanting the RTS aspect to not be broken by the ship bugs.

I think maybe this kind of high-stress game just attracts people that are prone to getting angry about things.
User avatar
MrTwosheds
Recycler
Posts: 3059
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 8:37 am
Location: Outer Space
Contact:

Re: the Battlezone Franchise was sold to Rebellion Interacti

Post by MrTwosheds »

I don't see why.
Removing the many limitations imposed by the Bz2 engine would effect gameplay greatly.
eg 32 players = nervous breakdown time for a bz2 commander, Command structures would have to be changed.
3d pathing, Realistic flying vehicles become possible, a total game changer. Proper 3d buildings and props, a much wider range of environments and environmental effects.
Everything would be different. Nobody these days is going to make a game with a box head of a Pilot quite like bz1/2, at the least it would have to be of UT quality or better and that opens up even more possibilities. It could be great! but it would be very far removed from both bz1 and 2. They are of their time. Nobody is going back there.
See the thread about reverse engineering BZ physics...into the Unreal engine? WTF?...Dude you just have to go and break a lot of the stuff that makes that engine worth using. Its like trying to "fix" a Ferrari so it drives like a Morris minor. :lol:
The Silence continues. The War Of Lies has no end.
User avatar
Red Devil
Recycler
Posts: 4398
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 5:10 pm
Location: High in the Rocky Mountains

Re: the Battlezone Franchise was sold to Rebellion Interacti

Post by Red Devil »

reading in the Brady Games "Battlezone Official Strategy Guide" that Acti was coming off the success of Mechwarrior II and ten Command and Conquer hit them like a tidal wave, so they were wondering if they could combine the FPS elements of MW II and the RTS elements of C&C, so they combined the AI from Dark Reign and the graphics from I-76 and saw it was do-able, then the CEO of Acti told Goldman they could get the rights to the original arcade Battlezone, so they built the new Battlezone engine from the 'ground, up' using bits and pieces from I-76, Dark Reign, Mechwarrior II, etc., like GSH said.

so, the idea for the game type came first, then they called it Battlezone.

i think what's important is that the FPS+RTS game type be preserved, even if it is not called Battlezone.
If given the truth, the people can be depended upon to meet any national crisis. The great point is to bring them the real facts - and beer.
Abraham Lincoln

Battlestrat, FE, G66, In The Shadows, Starfleet, Uler, & ZTV

Lifetime member of JBS and NRA
User avatar
GSH
Patch Creator
Posts: 2485
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 4:55 pm
Location: USA
Contact:

Re: the Battlezone Franchise was sold to Rebellion Interacti

Post by GSH »

From what I've seen of the source code -- BZ2's codebase started with the BZ1 engine, but this was 15 years ago now and my memory is a little cloudy -- calling BZ1 "ground up" from I76 is a vast overstatement. BZ1 is I76 with a year or two of tweaks, not something new plus some extracted useful pieces of I76.

-- GSH
User avatar
Red Devil
Recycler
Posts: 4398
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 5:10 pm
Location: High in the Rocky Mountains

Re: the Battlezone Franchise was sold to Rebellion Interacti

Post by Red Devil »

that's what i was trying to say, but failing again :|
If given the truth, the people can be depended upon to meet any national crisis. The great point is to bring them the real facts - and beer.
Abraham Lincoln

Battlestrat, FE, G66, In The Shadows, Starfleet, Uler, & ZTV

Lifetime member of JBS and NRA
User avatar
Zero Angel
Attila
Posts: 1536
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 12:54 am
Contact:

Re: the Battlezone Franchise was sold to Rebellion Interacti

Post by Zero Angel »

Roscoe wrote:I think maybe this kind of high-stress game just attracts people that are prone to getting angry about things.
That sounds about right. Though PvPers in-general tend to be more passionate about meta-game issues like balance, physics and 'feel'. That said, 'more passionate' sometimes equates to obnoxious, or the few who do tend to be persistent and unreasonable tend to be more attracted to PvP as well. Unfortunately you kind of have to be a bit of a dev in order to empathize with a dev and be able to explain things on his own wavelength (technical nitty-gritty, how x affects metagame in y and how y affects z, why it's a bad idea from a more neutral objective perspective, etc), most non-techs/non-geeks will have a hard time empathizing with a dev who has a systematic vision of how he wants to see the game, nor be able to trace his own motivations and leverage those to negotiate an outcome that pleases both the dev and the player.
Regulators
Regulate any stealin' of this biometal pool, we're damn good, too
But you can't be any geek off the street
Gotta be handy with the chains if you know what I mean
Earn your keep
Apollo
Sabre
Posts: 456
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 9:51 pm

Re: the Battlezone Franchise was sold to Rebellion Interacti

Post by Apollo »

Ken can correct me if i'm wrong but i see very little MW2 code and most of it is disabled, the I76 code is more of the engine with the renderer, sound code, part of the loader, game related code and network replaced. This is not complete but as for I76 it's mostly engine code, and not much of the game code. (i76building, bridge, vehicle roll code etc...)
Activision anet servers for all legacy anet games: Anet Servers
BattleZone Club (Supporting BattleZone 1.4, The Red Odyssey, BattleZone Enhanced, BattleZone 1.5 and Bionite)
BattleZone 1 Community Since 2002
User avatar
Nielk1
Flying Mauler
Posts: 2991
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 10:35 pm
Contact:

Re: the Battlezone Franchise was sold to Rebellion Interacti

Post by Nielk1 »

Side note ZA: There is a fundamental difference between passion about balance and physics and backward claims that the only right way was the way it was. People like that kill games.

Take any thriving MP competitive game, well aside from CoD, and you see constant updates and changes and an ever shifting meta-game. Take BZ2 and you see ppl flipping **** 'cause a scout rolls lower.
User avatar
Red Devil
Recycler
Posts: 4398
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 5:10 pm
Location: High in the Rocky Mountains

Re: the Battlezone Franchise was sold to Rebellion Interacti

Post by Red Devil »

thinking the MW2 code was used for the walkers, or at least used as a foundation.

and, yes, it's all about whose ox is being gored: in BF2, players complaining that wall glitchers are killing people with impunity, then wall-glitchers complaining that they can't kill with impunity when the devs fixed that. same with BZ2, et al.

apollo, how/why do you have access to the code?
If given the truth, the people can be depended upon to meet any national crisis. The great point is to bring them the real facts - and beer.
Abraham Lincoln

Battlestrat, FE, G66, In The Shadows, Starfleet, Uler, & ZTV

Lifetime member of JBS and NRA
Post Reply