Page 2 of 2

Re: new fe 2 issues

Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2013 2:54 am
by XxHAMADEHxX
I think its (not sure) the EDF or whatever they are called XD fighting the ISDF.

Re: new fe 2 issues

Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2013 12:43 pm
by Ded10c
Why are all these maps in FE again? do it no credit.

The ISDF is completely non-existant by early 2004 and FE is set half a decade later.

Re: new fe 2 issues

Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2013 8:09 pm
by XxHAMADEHxX
I dunno XD It just says fight renegade isdf XD and you play with isdf vehicles.

Re: new fe 2 issues

Posted: Sat Dec 28, 2013 9:39 pm
by Ded10c
That map has never been included in FE, what's it doing in RD's version?

Re: new fe 2 issues

Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 2:07 am
by XxHAMADEHxX
I dunno but its really cool so who cares? XD

Re: new fe 2 issues

Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 2:53 am
by Ded10c
A purist who'd rather works were released to stand on their own merit than be bundled with one of much greater standing as a crutch. FE does not deserve to be polluted by half-finished, poor-quality IA maps that could be downloaded in bulk from BZScrap. It's like shovelware.

Re: new fe 2 issues

Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 2:57 am
by XxHAMADEHxX
I understand stand what you mean, but this map is pretty good from what I've played. though as you said it should not have been bundled.
However I have seen a really terrible map the on the fe ia.

Re: new fe 2 issues

Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 3:10 am
by Red Devil
i included all the modded maps i could find so people wouldn't have to go looking for them (if they could find them) and for my own convenience so i would not have to go looking for them. yes, they still need work, but i am the one working on them.

i'll continue to work on them as i can, but it's pretty simple; if you're a snob from the peanut gallery and don't like them, don't play them - and leave your pretentious snobby attitudes at the door.

Re: new fe 2 issues

Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2013 3:43 am
by XxHAMADEHxX
XD dude ah is just mad that you put it in fe. You should have made an ia expansion pack instead(Which is honestly a better idea) =)