Doctor Who

Moderators: GSH, Commando, VSMIT

User avatar
Baconboy
Attila
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 11:49 pm
Location: On this forum, aren't I?
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who

Post by Baconboy »

:lol: I was thinking the same thing.
Shadow Knight
Thunderbolt
Posts: 158
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 6:39 am

Re: Doctor Who

Post by Shadow Knight »

Time lords regenerate 12 times, so River gave up 10 of them to save the Doctor.

The episode wasn't as good as I thought it would be. I was expecting more plot to do with the nazis and less "Oh noes the doctor is dying (again)". But then, the new series hasn't exactly been big on history episodes.

I liked seeing Caitlin Blackwood again, though.
User avatar
HitchcockGreen
Bull Dog
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:26 am

Re: Doctor Who

Post by HitchcockGreen »

Shadow Knight wrote:Time lords regenerate 12 times, so River gave up 10 of them to save the Doctor.
Maybe, maybe not. :mrgreen: And River isn't exactly a Time Lord. She was described as a "Child of the TARDIS."

"The BBC's Series 4 FAQ[9] suggests that now the Time Lord social order has been destroyed, the Doctor may be able to circumvent the limit on regenerations; it says: "Now that his people are gone, who knows? Time Lords used to have 13 lives." In Death of the Doctor (a 2010 The Sarah Jane Adventures serial), the Eleventh Doctor responds to a question from Clyde Langer by saying he can regenerate "507" times. Early news reports, before the episode was broadcast, suggested he would say there is no limit to the number of regenerations.[10] Writer Russell T Davies explained in an interview with SFX that the line was not intended to be taken seriously and is instead a commentary. He insisted that the "thirteen lives" rule was too deeply entrenched in the viewer consciousness for his throwaway line to affect it.[11]"
User avatar
Ded10c
Recycler
Posts: 3815
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:05 am
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who

Post by Ded10c »

As an aside for those who watched Torchwood, the final twist was visible from a mile off. (from the palpatine scene, to be exact)
User avatar
HitchcockGreen
Bull Dog
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:26 am

Re: Doctor Who

Post by HitchcockGreen »

I've honestly watched nothing of the new season. I'm saving it for off-Who season. :mrgreen:
User avatar
HitchcockGreen
Bull Dog
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:26 am

Re: Doctor Who

Post by HitchcockGreen »

Dunno about anyone else, but so far this second half of the season has been pretty meh for me.
Now I know that the Ponds are signed up "to appear" in season 7, but that doesn't mean they'll be regulars does it?
How many times did Rose make appearances?

Anyway.... 2 more episodes left, which I'm sure will be the highlight of the season.
User avatar
Baconboy
Attila
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 11:49 pm
Location: On this forum, aren't I?
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who

Post by Baconboy »

Too much gay jokes in the previous one. My little brother, 10, was like :shock: the whole time, because he was confused whether the Doctor and Craig were "actually partners."

And it seemed to have NOTHING to do with the finale. ???!!!
Whatever happened to two-parters? Instead of cramming EVERYTHING in one episode?
User avatar
Ded10c
Recycler
Posts: 3815
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:05 am
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who

Post by Ded10c »

That's one appearance down.

Also, Bacon, there is nothing wrong with humour like that. There's no need for it to be censored, and besides, homosexuality is a fact of life no matter how you swing it. Nothing wrong with making light of something.

That was clearly a filler episode though, but if the writers think it works then I guess it probably can. As something said, this is the first time the new series have used a single finale episode. Maybe it will work.
User avatar
HitchcockGreen
Bull Dog
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:26 am

Re: Doctor Who

Post by HitchcockGreen »

I had thought this episode was one of the leftovers from last season. Could be wrong, though.
At any rate, I agree. Baconboy, you can't take it so seriously. It's Doctor Who! :) Besides, all good Christian brothers love one another, right?

And no matter what your personal/religious beliefs, as AHadley pointed out, it's a fact of life. Tasteful light-hearted jokes are fun. I think the Doctor's orientation has been questioned many times before. :D

That aside, I thought overall the episode was indeed a bit of a filler, and leading up to what I assume will be the first episode of this season, although that leaves some continuity issues (remember how the Doctor stated he was 200 years older in episode one?) Maybe that will be explained away next episode or maybe it already was and I missed it. :shock:

It looks as though they are restructuring the airing dates again for season 7.
Season 7 of Doctor Who will not premiere during the established easter time slot in 2012. Instead it has been decided to not air Season 7 until Autumn 2012. From there the season will air the first 7 episodes, a two month hiatus between October and December will occur and take us to that years christmas special (which will be used as a mid-season bridge). The remaining 6 episodes of the season will then see a release in the spring of 2013, leading everyone directly into the shows 50th anniversary year.

Matt Smith has confirmed he is to stay with the show until at least 2013.
User avatar
Ded10c
Recycler
Posts: 3815
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:05 am
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who

Post by Ded10c »

He did say in that episode that he will die the next day, so I presume his two hundred years are gone already.
User avatar
HitchcockGreen
Bull Dog
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:26 am

Re: Doctor Who

Post by HitchcockGreen »

I can only assume that somewhere, between episodes, those 200 years have passed.

Been reading spoilers for the season finale and it sounds interesting.
User avatar
Ded10c
Recycler
Posts: 3815
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:05 am
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who

Post by Ded10c »

Image
User avatar
Baconboy
Attila
Posts: 1063
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 11:49 pm
Location: On this forum, aren't I?
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who

Post by Baconboy »

HitchcockGreen wrote:I can only assume that somewhere, between episodes, those 200 years have passed.

Been reading spoilers for the season finale and it sounds interesting.
I think I know what you're talking about. I just hope it's true. :mrgreen:

Unless, I'm not talking about what you're talking about. :?
User avatar
HitchcockGreen
Bull Dog
Posts: 504
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:26 am

Re: Doctor Who

Post by HitchcockGreen »

Baconboy wrote:
HitchcockGreen wrote:I can only assume that somewhere, between episodes, those 200 years have passed.

Been reading spoilers for the season finale and it sounds interesting.
I think I know what you're talking about. I just hope it's true. :mrgreen:

Unless, I'm not talking about what you're talking about. :?
Maybe. Or maybe not.

:lol:
User avatar
Ded10c
Recycler
Posts: 3815
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 11:05 am
Location: Stoke-on-Trent
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who

Post by Ded10c »

Just watched the last episode... it linked some parts of the last two half series that we were confused over together quite nicely. The twist at the end is very clever... and The Question is indeed hidden in plain sight.
Post Reply