Most of the time you can tell MPIers by spamming 20 gun towers around their base. Now, i do not claim to be a pro, it has been too long since i played, so most active strat players can wipe the floor with me. Now, most of those playing mpi then hosting a strat just don't understand how strat works. I almost never make towers in base, i always go for map domination like everyone else then try to get sabers/warriors up etc, but you get flamed and called a nub for "not making defenses first". You try to explain that by the time you make a gun tower the other team will have chains = they get the pools = they win, but you get called a n00b again and sometimes kicked (this happened to me the other day). So not that i want to flame or anything but those people sometimes act in a way that makes a person tell them very, very ugly things. And yes, i won 90% of the games in the past few days vs a commanders that play MPI most of the time. Bottom line is that most of them do not want to listen.Nielk1 wrote:When the MPI players try to play STRAT they get chased out (literally) and sometimes are followed back to their MPIs where their human recs are destroyed. We actually needed to spend valuable time on an anti-grief in 1.3pb6.1 because of that ****.
Nielk, i would agree with what you say. There were always arrogant flamers in BZ, for as long as i can remember. It only gets down to how thick is someone's hide and how willing they are to try something new. Playing vs ai when you can have a strat is beyond me. I can understand that people have some issues with self-certianty (or w/e is the english term for it) so they are afraid to try strat. But look at me, i'm a nub now and i go for strat only (dm if no strat), no other way to get better at the game.
