Page 9 of 17

Re: Doctor Who

Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 2:12 am
by HitchcockGreen
Psychedelic Rhino wrote:Yea, I thought the Dalek design was extremely low budget even for the 1960's, let alone now.

Not much more than a vacuum cleaner pulled around by monothread.
They've actually always had actors operating them from the insides. Most often, quite uncomfortably.
AHadley wrote:So much for The Rebel Flesh being a filler episode. That's going to make a mess of their wiki.
Never thought the two-parter would be filler, since it's the 'mini finale' before the summer break. They want you to be eager for September(?), after all. :lol:

Re: Doctor Who

Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 4:29 am
by HitchcockGreen
Ok. Just watched it. The whole Pond Pregnancy arc felt completely tacked on. Not all that impressed. Not exactly "on the edge of my seat" waiting for the next episode. Not saying I'm not going to watch it, but just saying. :)

Re: Doctor Who

Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 6:52 am
by Ded10c
Perhaps, but it was certainly a well-written tack-on.

Re: Doctor Who

Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 1:27 pm
by HitchcockGreen
It was, and I thought it was better than part 1.

Also, somehow stumbled across this. Not sure how.


Image

Re: Doctor Who

Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 1:40 pm
by Ded10c
That's pretty epic, good find :lol:

Re: Doctor Who

Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 3:48 pm
by Baconboy
You just made my day.
Not a bad episode.
Also, my view of Matt Smith is rising.
I'm getting very impressed by his performance.
Still like David Tennant better, but Matt's getting up there.

Re: Doctor Who

Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 3:50 pm
by HitchcockGreen
I like Matt Smith. Tennant was good, too.

Every doctor should be different.

Re: Doctor Who

Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 5:05 pm
by Baconboy
Yes, and everyone likes one the best.
I like Matt's humor and quirkyness.
I like David's sadness and anger.

Re: Doctor Who

Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 5:36 pm
by Ded10c
Both actors have handled acting alongside themselves very well indeed :lol:

Re: Doctor Who

Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 5:44 pm
by Baconboy
I have yet to see Matt in a sad state, though.
He's too happy.
A 900 year old time lord surrounded by death constantly ought to feel sad a good amount of time.

Re: Doctor Who

Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 5:52 pm
by Ded10c
Oh, he does anger quite well. And I'm sure he's perfectly capable of sadness.

Re: Doctor Who

Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 6:16 pm
by Baconboy
Capable and going to are different things.
Also, David's doctor would have yelled at Amy for going into the room with Prisoner Zero.
Matt just sat there and asked if Amy was okay.

Also, David Tennant would not have just left the mystery of the girl from series 6 open. He would have looked into it more. Matt didn't. He just left it.

Re: Doctor Who

Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 6:36 pm
by Ded10c
That's nothing to do with how good they are as actors - it's how they're written. Also, we have said already that every doctor is distinctly different from the last.

Re: Doctor Who

Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 10:11 pm
by Baconboy
Indeed, but Christopher Eccleston had somewhat the same personality as David.
You could tell they were one person.
With Matt Smith, you're not really and truly sure.

Re: Doctor Who

Posted: Sun May 29, 2011 10:56 pm
by Ded10c
Really. Watch the early Doctor Who stuff again.

Also, pay attention to Baker's work.