Battlezone Forums

The RTS side of the game demands fog of war, which is achieved through distance fog and radar range.

You can also set the fogrange and visibilityrange to negative values, one of slaors posts said that if you do say fogrange -250 800, that gives a good gloomy feel to the map as the fog is denser, the visibilityrange should always be above the fogrange or ugliness will occur.

Negative fogrange would work better if the fogbreak command was fixed (fogbreak originally controlled how gradually the fog levels ramped up from the start of the fog range to the end of the fog range instead of in the linear way it does now)

One main issue was no one could effectively describe WTF fog break did. Does it ramp from 0 to 50 at the break and 50 to 100 after? Or does it work some other way?

I've got (effectively) a code branch at 1.3pb4a sitting on my HD at home. I can quickly load it up, search that code, and see how things worked. However, the old graphics code is so confusing, it takes a while to figure out. The programmer who did it sometimes seems to abide by the philosophy of "if it was hard to write this code, it should be hard to read, too."

-- GSH

jaydenbz2 wrote:one of slaors posts said that if you do say fogrange -250 800, that gives a good gloomy feel to the map as the fog is denser

Brilliant!

In pb6 onwards I find it best to always set the max fogrange and the visibility distance to the same value, seems to be the best way to blend the terrain and sky with fog.

I have also used alpha channel faded skydomes to reduce sudden looming by terrain coming into the visibility range, good for foggy maps, not much good for those who like horizons.

i started doing that after Slaor posted about that; works great ::

The way I understood fogbreak is that it acted somewhat like the 'curves' control on photoshop -- and made adjustments to the fog density based on distance let's assume that if the fogbreak is set at 0.5 so that fog values ramped up in a linear fashion from the start of the fogrange to the end of the fogrange. And the fog range was set from 100 to 500.
Using a fogbreak of, say 0.35 would change the fog values to something like this Allowing the fog to ramp up more gradually.

I don't know exactly whether fogbreak moved the midpoint of the fog or whether it affected some kind of algorithm that affected the 'curve' of the fog density but it did allow mapmakers to create interesting looking effects using fog (like having a very subtle pervading fog on the map which then faded out more suddenly near the end of the range) or to simply create a nicer transition towards the end of the visibility range.

@Red DEvil, me too, it was such a good idea.
And we REALLY should have some kind of fix if possible, to allow the fogbreak thing, maps could be so much nicer with it I think, instead of the sometimes ugly default fogbreak.

Would be nice if we could make terrain fade in from 0 alpha instead of just BOOM there at visual range too.

Have discussed that, fading terrain is a very process intensive way to go, fading the sky is much more efficient. Maybe there is another process cheap solution we haven't thought of.

There is a sky.renderbeforeterrain feature in the console, this can be nice with some maps and it closely follows what 1.2 done.

jaydenbz2 wrote:There is a sky.renderbeforeterrain feature in the console, this can be nice with some maps and it closely follows what 1.2 done.

This was added with the comment it probably wouldst do what we think, and really it doesn't. It looks quite ugly most of the time and would only work in a very select few situations.

sky.renderbeforeterrain sort of allows terrain to fade out similar to pre-1.3 but it's glitchy and not practical for normal usage.