Battlezone Forums

in China, life is cheap.

2,000,000 dogs are skinned alive each year there to put little bits of fur on stuff:

http://animalsaviors.org/

Red Devil wrote:in China, life is cheap.

2,000,000 dogs are skinned alive each year there to put little bits of fur on stuff:

http://animalsaviors.org/

That's why you store the corpses in barrels of formaldehyde for two years. So, when you suddenly decide to take them out, the congealed paste that used to be organ tissue will come rushing out. This is key to making Organ Paste Lubricant.

i heard they stopped using that stuff:

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/sideshow/mc ... MWFhLWIxNT

Now you almost gave the impression that MacDonalds might actually have been selling products with ingredients sourced from cats and dogs...I'm sure you didn't, that could be very expensive!
But whatever, these days you just know, whatever anyone says about their products, that they probably don't really know where it all came from, and if your really bothered about paying good money only to be fed your own pets in a sauce of your own recycled sh*t. Then you have to be very very careful what you eat.

Interesting how the article gives the impression most of the ingredients listed are entirely unusual and dangerous things to be eating.

Red Devil wrote:2,000,000 dogs are skinned alive each year there to put little bits of fur on stuff

I was hoping to find a youtube clip from Futurama where some sort of company had genetically engineered cute little rainbow colored teddy-bear type creatures, then killed and stuffed them because it was cheaper than just making stuffed animals in the first place... No dice.

Interesting how the article gives the impression most of the ingredients listed are entirely unusual and dangerous things to be eating.

Well I wouldn't actually knowingly pay someone to feed me crushed beetles and sand...makes good old fashioned sawdust seem like quite a treat.

Just because it's silicon dioxide doesn't mean it's sand.

Doesn't make it food either.

What you define as "food" is partly subjective. You wouldn't consider a dog as a source of food, for example, but some people would.

AHadley wrote:What you define as "food" is partly subjective. You wouldn't consider a dog as a source of food, for example, but some people would.

I consider dogs and cats food, due to it being an attribute of my culture. But, I grew up in the Merica's, so I'm used to them being used as companions as well.

MrTwosheds wrote:Doesn't make it food either.

There's actually tribes who do eat dirt.